top_left_banner_image







top_banner_image
Website ©copyright RCVDA 2007. Devised by Highground Design

Redcar & Cleveland Local Safeguarding Children Board

On the 1st of April 2010 the South Tees Local Safeguarding Children Board was replaced by the Redcar & Cleveland Safeguarding Children Board (RCSCB) and the Middlesbrough Safeguarding Children Board.   The RCSB has a new website click here to see local guidance regarding all aspects of safeguarding

Safeguarding Children and Young People

The Safe Network is jointly managed by the NSPCC and Children England, and was created as a result of the Government’s Staying Safe action plan. One of the things that they are working towards is to build common standards for voluntary/non-profit organisations. Two of the resources which are free to VCS organisations are the Are they Safe? pack and Keeping our children safe. Raising awareness in BME communities CD-rom.

Tees Valley News You Can Use

This publication is produced as part of the Tees Valley Wide Basis Bid and includes information on a variety of opportunities including funding and tendering opportunities.  Click here for the latest issue.

Work with children and vulnerable adults                                                  21 June 2010

Despite what you may have read or heard in the media, the vetting and barring (VBS) scheme has not been scrapped – some aspects of it have been put on hold while it is reviewed.

 

And despite what it says on the Business Link website and probably in other places as well, compulsory registration with the Independent Safeguarding Authority is not, at least for the moment, going ahead in November. All registrations – both voluntary from 26 July and compulsory from November – are on hold.

 

Sandy Adirondack writes "From the morass of contradictory and confusing information I have tried to extract what I think is an accurate summary of which aspects of the VBS are already in place and will remain in place, which are suspended while the scheme is being reviewed and “remodelled” as announced on 15 June, and which are subject to consultations that started before the review was announced."

Further information can be found by following the links below:

A summary of recent VBS changes, the current review of the scheme, and Home Office guidance on the scheme as a whole and on safeguarding during the review period.

www.sandy-a.co.uk/employment.htm#vbs

 

Changes to the definition of regulated activity (including charity trustees) following the Singleton review.

www.sandy-a.co.uk/employment.htm#regulatedactivity

 

Registration of health and adult social care providers with the Care Quality Commission – from 1 October.

www.sandy-a.co.uk/employment.htm#careregistration

 

Source: Sandy Adirondack

_______________________________________________________________________

Equality Act Implementation                                                                                                     21 June 2010

    

The Government Equality Office (GEO) has on 18th June withdrawn the timetable that detailed when and which parts of the  Equality Act would come into force. Some elements were due to come into force in October 2010. The GEO had published a timetable online but that has been withdrawn. A GEO spokeswoman said that the withdrawal was due to the recent change in government and that the new government had yet to finalise its own legislative timetable. “An announcement on scheduling for implementation of the Equality Act will be made in due course," said the spokeswoman, who confirmed that the new government is not bound by the timetable set by its predecessor.

Experts say

  • the government may end up not implementing many of the Act's provisions.
  • they are unlikely  to repeal the law. They will just implement the parts of the Act they like and not the parts they don't. Elements of the Act might just sit on the statute book awaiting another change of Government.
  • Three parts of the Act were highlighted by the Conservatives in the run up to the recent election as being elements they would not introduce.The first is a provision that when hiring, companies could discriminate in favour of people from under-represented groups such as women, ethnic minorities or disabled people, but only if candidates were equally well qualified.The second area was the requirement that companies report the gap between the amount they pay women and the amount they pay men. The third part of the law that the Conservatives said they would not introduce was a provision forcing public authorities to take socio-economic factors into account when allocating their resources..
  • the more managerial elements of the Act are likely to make it into law.
Official Change to Government Equalities Website  reads:-   The Government is currently considering how the different provisions will be commenced so that the Act is implemented in an effective and proportionate way. In the meantime, the Government Equalities Office continues to work on the basis of the previously announced timetable, which envisaged commencement of the Act's core provisions in October 2010.

 

 

 

 
"));